John 1:37, The Beloved Disciple Inclusio
And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.
//Yesterday, I pointed out the Petrine Inclusio in the Gospel of Mark. This, some scholars surmise, is meant to imply that the Gospel of Mark carries the authority of Peter.
Well, a similar inclusio occurs in the Gospel of John, this time highlighting the mysterious Beloved Disciple. In today’s verse, one of the two disciples mentioned is universally considered to be the Beloved Disciple. This verse, then, forms an inclusio with this story in the last chapter of John:
Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee? –John 21:20
So the first and the last disciple mentioned in John’s Gospel is the Beloved Disciple! What makes this particularly fascinating is that John’s Gospel blatantly contradicts Mark’s claim that Peter was the first disciple called, and says instead that it was the Beloved Disciple.
John is claiming a greater authority than Mark: He is claiming the authority of the true first disciple. Indeed, this verse (John 21:20) seems to put Peter and the B.D. at odds. This should hardly come as a surprise, since nearly every time John’s Gospel refers to an event recorded in the Gospel of Mark, John contradicts Mark to set the record straight.
4 Comments
Leave a Reply to Alan Keohane Cancel reply
Fantasy Football, Anyone?
Put on the whole uniform of the Team, that ye may be able to stand against the blitz of oncoming linebackers. Don the hip pads of truth, the shoulder pads of righteousness, the cleats of preparation. Don’t forget the facemask of faith and the helmet of salvation. Then clutch the pigskin with much Spirit, for that is what the Play Book of your Coach in Heaven demands.The River of Life
Twice before Lee Harmon has written about Christian topics, once on the gospel of John and once on the book of Revelation. But the question people keep asking him is this: As a liberal Christian, why do you care so much about the Bible? Others wonder whether he is truly a Christian at all.
The Way It Happened
|
|
| Revelation: A love story gone awry. | The Gospel: A love story set aright. |
What really happened 2,000 years ago? How did a persecuted minority of end-time believers known as Christians, with their dreams of Armageddon and a conquering Messiah named Jesus, evolve into the largest religion in the world? Author Lee Harmon explores the period in which the New Testament was written in his books about John's Gospel and Revelation.
(Bloggers: you may be eligible for a free review copy! Just contact us.)
Connect With Me!
A Top-100 Christian Blog
Named an Exceptional Website for Christian Theologians
Our Top Book Picks
Selected by The Dubious Disciple as Best Religion Books. Don't miss these!
Subscribers:
Twitter Followers
Facebook Fans
16806 Blog Members
354 Circles
603 Goodreads Friends & Fans
The God Show
Lee Harmon interviewed on The God Show about the History Channel's miniseries The Bible and Lee's latest book, John's Gospel: The Way It Happened.
About Lee
Hello! I'm an author, historical Jesus scholar, book reviewer, and liberal Christian, which means I appreciate and attempt to exercise the humanitarian teachings of Jesus without getting hung up on any particular supernatural or religious beliefs.
The Bible is a magnificent book that has inspired and spiritually fed generations for thousands of years, and each new century seems to bring a deeper understanding of life’s purpose. This is true of not only Christianity; through the years, our age-old religions are slowly transforming from superstitious rituals into humanitarian philosophies. In short, we are growing up, and I am thrilled to be riding the wave.
I avidly read all thought-provoking religion titles. New authors: I'd love to read and review your book!
Contact me here.
About Leslie
Hi! While Lee writes the articles and reviews the books, I edit, organize, and maintain the blog. The views expressed here are Lee's but I'm his biggest supporter! :-)
“the first and the last disciple mentioned in John’s Gospel is the Beloved Disciple!” – is a flagrant distortion of the facts because, IN FACT, Andrew and an unidentified disciple BOTH follow Jesus together in the start of the fourth gospel (1:35-40) [and no beloved disciple is noted in the text].
But given you are so quick to lean on your own understanding (and assume that the fourth gospel “blatantly contradicts” the other gospels, for example), it is no surprise that you would also distort what is presented elsewhere in scripture.
I don’t always agree with Lee, but I do appreciate that he challenges my preconceptions and always makes me think. Wouldn’t it be more constructive to engage him in respectful dialog?
Lee, thanks for continuing to raise interesting questions.
Quite welcome, Alan, though I’d love to hear from you more often when you don’t agree.
Who do you imagine the other disciple to be, then? It clearly isn’t Peter, who shows up later, so this is a pretty blatant contradiction in my opinion.
Thanks for contributing!