Theological rants
of a liberal Christian

Genesis 29:25, What Did Jacob Steal From Esau?

Monday, August 13, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

When morning came, there was Leah! 

//If you said Jacob stole Esau’s birthright, you’re right.

If you said Jacob stole Esau’s blessing, you’re right.

If you said Jacob stole Esau’s wife, you’re right.

According to oral tradition in the Kabbalah, the story goes that Laban’s two daughters had been betrothed to Isaac’s two sons all along. Rachel to Jacob, the older Leah to the older Esau. Jacob falls in love with Rachel and agrees to work seven years for her, while Esau wanders off and ignores his bride. So, after the seven years are over, Leah remains unmarried, and according to custom, the older must marry first, so in the morning Jacob wakes up to find not Rachel in bed with him, but Leah! He has married the one betrothed to his brother! 

He works another seven years for Rachel, and Esau seems unperturbed about losing Leah (she had “weak eyes”), so all’s well that ends well.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: Elijah, the Last Prophet

Sunday, August 12, 2012 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: Elijah, the Last Prophet

by Mickey Mullen

★★

I met Mickey, this book’s author, on a public forum at Goodreads.com, where he insisted on spouting the most insane, impossible story of his Christian conversion. God gave him a new heart. No, I mean it, a real one. God sucked the old one out and replaced it with a new blood pump.

Mickey doesn’t know it, but I watched him for months, telling his story and enduring the ridicule. I can’t believe his story … I’m just not wired to swallow that kinda thing … but whatever the heck happened to Mickey that day, it left an impression. He may have been a hell raiser before his conversion, but today he’s an absolute saint for what he puts up with on Goodreads.com, and never loses his cool. My curiosity sparked, and I offered to review a book he had written.

Turns out he’s more than a saint. He’s the prophet Elijah, and he’s got a message for us. For one thing, we shouldn’t bother reading most of the New Testament. Stick to the Gospels and stay away from the Satanic influence of Paul. Mickey’s writing style is a bit unorthodox, and the punctuation questionable, but I’m not sure I’d have it any other way … somehow it sets just the right tone.

I was captivated for about 40 pages, while Mickey recounted stories of his childhood. Setting the stage, I assumed, for what was to come: a miraculous conversion experience. Reading the book is a bit like sitting on a log around a campfire, listening to grandpa reminisce. But the storytelling grew old, and I began to wish he’d get on with the supernatural stuff, so I was more than ready when the book turned preachy. Finally, we must be getting to the point! Okay, Mickey, I’ll swear off Paul, if you’ll tell me what happened to you! But the preachy stage came to an end, and the reminiscing began again. Along the way I learned how to drive safely, how to roast hot dogs, I learned just about everything except what I hoped. Mickey’s miraculous baptism by the Holy Ghost blew by in a couple sentences without fanfare, and the storytelling began to meander again without direction until it simply petered out on the final page as if he ran out of breath and decided to call it a night.

Mickey, you seem like a fascinating guy, it would be fun to stoke the campfire together, but your book doesn’t go anywhere.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Revelation 6:14, The Heavens Roll Up

Saturday, August 11, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

The sky receded like a scroll, rolling up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.

//This verse may be difficult to picture from today’s understanding of the cosmos, but in the day it was written, it actually made perfect sense. The sky was pictured as a dome overhead, enclosing the flat earth, and when the day came for the earth to be destroyed, the dome was rolled up and discarded. Whether or not Jews truly expected a cataclysmic end to the universe or were merely playing with metaphors, at least the idea made sense back in the day.

The image of the universe as a big scroll holds me spellbound. Revelation alludes to another mysterious scroll, with all of the mysteries of God written therein. In Islamic thought, God provides two great tools for our understanding: The Qur’an and the physical universe are twin manifestations of God Himself. The universe can be pictured like a written scroll, perhaps slowly unrolling to teach us about God’s glory and the meaning of his creation. It invites us to explore and learn. One day, of course, it’ll come to an end … “The Day when we shall roll up the heavens as a recorder rolleth up a written scroll.” (Qur’an 21:104). 

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Genesis 23:1-2, How Did Abraham’s Wife Die?

Friday, August 10, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 3 comments

Sarah lived to be a hundred and twenty-seven years old. She died at Kiriath Arba. 

//Do you picture Isaac as a young boy when Abraham took him up the mountain to sacrifice him? Most people do. But one wonders how he is able to carry the wood for the sacrifice on his back if he’s a child.

Instead, according to both the Talmud and the Kabbalah, Isaac was a fully-grown man of 37 years old. Now, if we do the math, Isaac was born to Sarah when she was 90, and Sarah died when she was 127 years old, so that would make Isaac 37 years old. Thus Sarah died in the year God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, his son.

We can probably pin the time of her death down even further. After Abraham (and presumably Isaac) trudge back down the mountain after the aborted sacrifice, they head off to Beersheba. The very next thing we read is that Sarah died at Kiriath Arba (Hebron), and Abraham “went” to mourn for her. So Abraham never saw his wife again alive after he left to sacrifice Isaac. Batteries hadn’t been invented yet, so Abraham’s cell phone would have been no help. We are left with the assumption that Sarah died of heartache from Abraham travelling off to murder her only son.

So, God saves Abraham’s son from sacrifice but the ordeal kills his wife?

Got an opinion? 3 comments

Book review: What is the Bible?

Thursday, August 9, 2012 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: What is the Bible?

by Rev. Anne Robertson

★★★★

This little booklet serves as a basic textbook to introduce the Bible in the Dickinsen Series Program of the Massachusetts Bible Society. It’s intended for class session, recognizing that there may be two levels of learners in each class: some may be taking the course out of general interest only, while others may wish to pursue a Certificate of Biblical Literacy, requiring more in-depth exercises, and earning Continuing Education Units. The four books in the course include:

[1] What is the Bible?

[2] Introducing the Old Testament

[3] Introducing the New Testament

[4] The Bible in Context (a look at the culture and surrounding events of the various times in the biblical narrative)

Book one (today’s topic) is sort of a “What’s the big deal?” treatment, introducing the two Testaments, what’s hidden in the Bible, how it was put together, why there are so many translations, and why people argue so vehemently over words like “inerrant” and “inspired.” Above all, this introduction stresses tolerance and understanding for the different ways of reading scripture. It encourages you to examine your own beliefs objectively so that other opinions about the Bible can be appreciated (remember, it’s written to be used in class discussion), and it serves as a great lead-in to the coming volumes.  Robertson’s writing is engaging, written with humor and lots of little anecdotes. It reminds me a little of the “Dummy” instruction series. But as friendly as it is, it’s like any textbook: If ya don’t do the exercises, ya don’t get the benefit.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Psalm 90:4, How Old is the Universe?

Wednesday, August 8, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 3 comments

For a thousand years in Your sight are like yesterday when it is past, and like a watch in the night.

//Here’s one for you guys who think the universe is really thirteen or fourteen billion years old. Hogwash, right? My Bible says the world began in the year 4,004 BC. That’s just 6,016 years ago, folks.

Of course, the book of Psalms indicates that for God, a thousand years goes by like a watch in the night. A few hours.

Lamentations 2:19 describes the first watch, presumably from sunset to 10 pm. Judges 7:19 describes the second, from 10 pm to 2 am. Exodus 14:24 gives us the third, the “morning watch,” from 2 am to morning light. So there are roughly four hours in each watch.

Now, let’s do a little math. Apparently, 1,000 years for God goes by in four hours, and the number of four-hour periods in 1,000 years is 2,190,000. God’s time runs 2,190,000 times faster than our time.

So the universe began 6,016 years ago, from God’s perspective? How long is that in “human years?” 6,016 X 2,190,000 = 13.2 billion years.

Hey, maybe our scientists got it right!

(Corollary: Methuselah lived to be 969 years old. That means he died at the ripe old age of three hours and fifty two minutes. Well, every theory has its problems.)

Got an opinion? 3 comments

Genesis 7:7, Noah’s Studly Sons

Tuesday, August 7, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives entered the ark to escape the waters of the flood.

//According to the Bible, all humans share two common ancestral sets of parents: Adam and Eve, and Noah and his wife. When the flood came, it wiped out all life except Noah’s family, so we all descend from Noah as well. (Note that we descend from other genealogical lines as well, through the wives of Noah’s sons, who accompanied him onto the ark.)

The most recent research in human evolution uses mitochondrial DNA (mitDNA) to trace human origins through mother-to-daughter inheritance, and nuclear DNA to trace through father-to-son inheritance. It turns out all males share a common father, a sort of Y-chromosomal Adam, projected to have lived about 80,000 years ago. Curiously, however, when we trace the matrilineal line to find a common mother, we have to go clear back to 150,000 years ago. Researchers call her Eve.

So, does that mean Adam lived 70,000 years after Eve? How can that be? Should we instead figure the discovered common father to be Noah, not Adam? This leads to a couple conclusions:

[1] The flood happened about the year 80,000 BC, and the creation about 150,000 BC.

[2] It takes 70,000 years for the ancestors of all the wives of Noah’s sons to converge back through time into a single Eve. Wow, just how many wives accompanied these three sons on board the ark? Is that why the ark had to be so big?

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: Living The Questions, the Wisdom of Progressive Christianity

Monday, August 6, 2012 in Book Reviews | 5 comments

Book review: Living The Questions, the Wisdom of Progressive Christianity

by David M. Felten and Jeff Procter-Murphy

★★★★★

Latin re-ligio: To relink, to reconnect.

Buy this book! If I do a “best of 2012” summary this January, I guarantee this one will be near the top. Heart and head both feel satisfied as I turn the last page.

This is what progressive Christianity is all about. It will toy with your emotions, lift you to the heights of compassion, and fill your soul with awe for the beauty and mystery of life we share. God is in this book, until you set the book down and discover He has wiggled out of its pages and into your soul. Perhaps God was inside you all along, waiting to be reawakened?

Many of us do need reawakening; religion has become a turn-off for many. In no other area of life is the denial of progress held up as a virtue. But according to Felten and Procter-Murphy, stagnation, not change, is Christianity’s deadliest enemy. Vital faith is dynamic, flowing, and moving. Progressive Christianity, by its very name, is about progress. Rethinking the meaning of Christology, atonement, and the Incarnation is part of the journey. Losing interest in the Rapture is a necessary side effect.

“Living the Questions” is an enigmatic title, and the book begins with this insight: “To not ask questions is tantamount to forfeiting one’s own spiritual birthright and allowing other people’s experience of the Divine to define your experience.” It ends with the reminder that “those who embrace mystery are free to interpret the Divine in new and fresh ways.” In the pages between, however, we travel back in time to the Jesus of history, a man of vision and compassion, and a this-worldly concern largely ignored by the creeds of the religion that sprouted in his name. The essence of Jesus’ ministry might be distilled down into one word: compassion.

Then we’re reintroduced to God who, through the scriptures, is Mother, Father, the Wind, a Rock, and finally just Love. God, says John Shelby Spong (who along with Fox and Crossan is quoted liberally in these pages) is the life power itself, the power of love itself, the “Ground of Being.”

One final note: I’m not a poetry reader, but the occasional sprinkling of poetry by Cynthia Langston Kirk was mesmerizing … I suspect in part because the atmosphere of the book primed me to appreciate the poetic. 

Got an opinion? 5 comments

Daniel 9:25, Counting down to the Messiah, III of III

Sunday, August 5, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. –Daniel 9:25

//I introduced today’s verse in yesterday’s post, and it holds the key to Daniel’s puzzle. We continue our discussion about Daniel’s 490-year prediction until the Messiah’s arrival.

To recap:  If we count 490 years from the date the Jews returned from exile and began rebuilding the temple according to the decree of Artaxerxes (457 BCE) we arrive at the year 33 CE … the year many believe Jesus died. That makes Jesus the Messiah. This solution to the puzzle satisfies Christians but not historians, who are required to work within the constraints of the non-supernatural. If, however, we begin counting the 490 years from the date Jeremiah prophesied of a new temple, we get an even worse answer: around 107 BC. No messiah that year, for certain. So what did Daniel mean?

Note that Daniel breaks his prediction period down into two chunks, and then afterward he introduces a final “week” (seven years) of tribulation. So that’s how the 490 years are broken down: 62×7 (434 years) plus 7×7 (49) plus 7. Most people add these figures up and reach 490 years. However, it may be that we are not supposed to count these periods consecutively, but concurrently. A 49-year period and a 434-year period, leading to a final 7-year period. If we do it this way, we get something like this:

Seven sevens from the destruction of Jerusalem (586 BC) we reach year 537. Within a year of this date, Cyrus releases the Jews to return to Jerusalem. So set the 49-year prophecy aside; it’s a done deal, a completed prophecy.

Yesterday, we concluded that Jeremiah’s prophecy would have been assumed sometime before the year of deportation, 597 BC. Figure just a few years before that date. Adding 434 years to roughly this period, we come to about 167 BC.

You know the rest. Seven years of bloody war ensued as Judas Maccabeus, acclaimed as one of the greatest warriors of Jewish history, leads a revolt against the Seleucid Empire. Halfway through this 7-year war, Antiochus IV desecrates the temple as Daniel predicts. (see Daniel 9:27).

Pretty amazing again, huh? How Daniel predicts this victory hundreds of years earlier, and selects Judas Maccabeus as the coming savior? Well, with this interpretation Daniel’s prophecy is no longer quite that amazing. Scholars date the actual writing of the book of Daniel to precisely this time in history. Daniel’s biographer was not writing prophecy, but history.

Got an opinion? 2 comments

Daniel 9:2-3, Counting down to the Messiah, II of III

Saturday, August 4, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the LORD given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. So I turned to the Lord God and pleaded with him in prayer and petition, in fasting, and in sackcloth and ashes.

//We continue our discussion from yesterday, and Daniel’s prediction of 490 years until the Messiah’s arrival.

Note the reference to Jeremiah in today’s verse. God told Jeremiah that Babylon would rule for 70 years (see Jeremiah 25:11-12), but Daniel asks again about the 70 years and is given a different answer. Does this mean Daniel’s 490-year prediction should also date from Jeremiah’s time? Yesterday, we assumed Daniel was counting the years from Xerxes’ command to rebuild the city of Jerusalem, but Jeremiah, too, predicted the rebuilding of Jerusalem:

I will bring Judah and Israel back from captivity and will rebuild them as they were before. –Jeremiah 33:7

So, did Daniel’s 490 years begin with Xerxes or Jeremiah? Let’s switch from Xerxes to Jeremiah and see where that takes us. Judah’s captivity began in the year 586 BC, and 70 years later in the year 516 BC, the temple was rebuilt as Jeremiah prophesied. But if we instead add 490 years to 586 BC, we reach the year 96 BC. Unfortunately, this doesn’t help us at all; nothing spectacular happened that year. No Messiah then.

Instead, we need to read Daniel’s prophecy a little closer. Skipping ahead to verse 9:25, we read:

“Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. –Daniel 9:25

Aha! So the 490 years begin from the date Jeremiah makes his prophecy, not from the date Jerusalem is conquered! In other words, we need to date today’s verse: Jeremiah 33:7. That will tell us when to begin counting.

Unfortunately, there is no way to know precisely when this was supposedly penned, because Jeremiah’s warnings are not in chronological order, but the majority of his writings center around the first deportation of the Jews under Nebechednezzer (597 BC). Some prophecies appear to be after this date (see chapters 23-25), and some before (see chapter 35). If we add Daniel’s 490 years to roughly this period, we come to about the year 107 BC.

Sigh. Another dead end. Nothing spectacular happened in 107 BC either. I’ll give you time to contemplate, and we’ll solve the puzzle tomorrow.

Got an opinion? 0 comments