Theological rants
of a liberal Christian

Acts 18:18, The Haircut That Cost Paul His Life

Friday, September 7, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

Paul stayed on in Corinth for some time. Then he left the brothers and sailed for Syria, accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila. Before he sailed, he had his hair cut off at Cenchrea because of a vow he had taken.

//Ever wonder about this vow made by Paul? I wish Paul himself had written about this vow, but he didn’t, so we’re left to speculate. So speculate I shall.

“’Priests must not shave their heads or shave off the edges of their beards or cut their bodies,” says Leviticus 21:5. But non-priests were free to cut their hair, and in fact, it became a way of mourning or sealing a vow to God in times of distress. Like wearing sackcloth and ashes. To underscore the vow, Israelites cut the hair off their head and burnt it at the altar of the Temple in Jerusalem.

Paul appears to have made a vow in Corinth and sealed it with a haircut at Cenchrea. He was about to embark on a lengthy journey which would eventually land him in Jerusalem. His purpose was to deliver a collection of money needed by the Jews there, but his friends begged him not to go, knowing the danger. But Paul had made a vow and wouldn’t listen. He seemed determined to go personally to the Temple in Jerusalem, perhaps carrying his hair to be burned.

You know the rest: He was captured, taken to Rome, and probably was never again a free man. There, in Rome, he was beheaded.


Got an opinion? 2 comments

Genesis 20:17, The First Prayer Answered For Another

Thursday, September 6, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Then Abraham prayed to God, and God healed Abimelech, his wife and his slave girls so they could have children again.

 //The story goes that when Abraham lived in Gerar, he deceived Abimelech, king of Gerar, telling him that his wife Sarah was really his sister. So Abimelech, knowing no better, “sent for Sarah and took her.” (Not really; two verses later, scripture explains that he didn’t have opportunity to get near her, but it was apparently a close call. God intervened.)

Nevertheless, God is angry, and says Abimelech had better make things right with Abraham or he will die. God also “closed up every womb in Abimelech’s household” so that Abimelech couldn’t conceive an heir.

Abimelech pleads with Abraham, and Abraham is moved to pray to God, not only to spare Abimelech’s life but to restore his ability to conceive. God hears the prayer, and opens the wombs of Abimelech’s wife and slave girls.

Legend tells us that this was the first time in human history that God fulfilled the prayer of one human being for another. Not the first time someone prayed for another; Abraham had previously begged God to spare Sodom, though God refused. But Abraham’s incessant pleading for others wore God down. Indeed, as the legend goes, the very reason God conversed with Abraham at all was because of Abraham’s concern for others: when Abraham begged for leniency toward Sodom, God said, “You take delight in defending My creatures, and you would not call them guilty. That is why I have spoken to no one but you during the ten generations since Noah.”

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: The Jewish Gospels

Wednesday, September 5, 2012 in Book Reviews | 2 comments

Book review: The Jewish Gospels

by Daniel Boyarin

★★★★★

Just when you think you’ve got it all figured out, along comes Daniel Boyarin, a professor of Talmudic Culture and Rhetoric at the University of California.

You think Christianity’s unique contribution to Judaism was the introduction of a god-man? Wrong. Could it be the idea of a suffering savior? Wrong again. Maybe that Jesus rejected Jewish dietary laws and Sabbath restrictions, freeing us from the Law? Hardly; Boyarin paints a very Jewish Jesus in his reading of the Gospels, certainly a Jesus who keeps kosher.

Christianity’s one claim to fame may be the insistence that the Messiah had already arrived, but that’s about the extent of its uniqueness. Otherwise, Christianity is a very Jewish offshoot of a Jewish religion. Boyarin draws from texts like the Book of Daniel and 1st Enoch to explain the title Son of Man (which, it turns out, is a much more exalted title than Son of God) and in turn to expose the expectation of many first-century Jews of just such a divine savior.

This is a fascinating, controversial book presenting a very different look at Jesus as one who defended Torah from wayward Judaic sects (the Pharisees), rather than vice versa. I don’t think the arguments are fully developed yet, but certainly Boyarin introduces “reasonable doubt” against traditional scholarship. Let the arguing begin.

Got an opinion? 2 comments

1 Timothy 2:15, Saved Through Childbearing

Monday, September 3, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

//This particular section of scripture (attributed to Paul, though probably written after his time) draws little appreciation from most women. First, “Paul” insists that a woman may not speak in church, but should “learn in quietness and full submission.” Then he says that women will be saved by having children.

Really?

Actually, there is another interpretation of this verse. In no translation does it actually say saved by having kids. It says through, or in. And what, exactly, does “saved” mean? We tend to read the New Testament through the lens of today’s afterlife-oriented Christianity, but that may be inappropriate.

Consider, for example, that Timothy (the letter’s addressee) lived in Ephesus. Just down the street from him would be the world-famous temple dedicated to Artemis, the goddess who protected women from harm as they gave birth to children. I’ve heard it said that one out of two women in Ephesus died during childbirth; if that’s true, then Artemis wasn’t doing a very good job.

Artemis’s failure should come as no surprise. Recall God’s promise to Eve because of her sin in the Garden of Eden: To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. But in the new age, the paradise of Eden will be restored, and this age, according to the first Christians, lived in its birth pangs. It was supposed to be just around the corner.

Thus in today’s verse “Paul” exposes Artemis as a fraud while at the same time reminding believers of the promise of safe child bearing through faithfulness to the true God.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Psalm 118:8, The Center Of It All

Sunday, September 2, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Open your Bible to its center; chapter 118 of the book of Psalms.

This chapter sits between the shortest chapter and the longest chapter in the Bible. There are 594 chapters before it, and 594 chapters after it.

Add up all those chapters and you get 1188. So, let’s read ahead to verse 8. Psalm 118:8. This verse, I’m told, is the very center verse in the Bible.

It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

There you have it. 

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Genesis 25:1, Who Was Abraham’s Second Wife?

Saturday, September 1, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah.

//After Sarah died, Abraham married again, to a woman named Keturah. Together, they had several more children. 1 Chronicles 1:32, however, calls Keturah not a wife but a concubine. So which is it? Wife or concubine?

Answer: Maybe both. Keturah was Sarah’s maidservant and bore a child to Abraham years before she became Abraham’s wife. How do we know this? Because if oral tradition is to be trusted, we already know this woman well. Keturah is another name for Hagar, the woman who bore Ishmael. The woman whom Sarah demanded be cast out into the desert with her son. Keturah means “perfumed,” and the tradition notes that Hagar was “perfumed with good deeds.”

So with Hagar out on her own, how did this reconnect with Abraham transpire? Well, it turns out that Isaac had been living in Beerlahairoi before he married, which hints that he had been living with Hagar and Ishmael. See Genesis 16:14, 24:62, 25:11. Evidently, after Sarah died, the influence of Isaac and Ishmael brought Hagar and Abraham back together … one happy family once again. When Abraham died, Isaac and Ishmael together buried him.

A speculative scenario, but a pleasant one.

Got an opinion? 2 comments

Book review: The Searchers

Wednesday, August 29, 2012 in Book Reviews | 2 comments

Book review: The Searchers

by Joseph Loconte

★★★★★

Well, I screwed up this time. I picked up The Searchers from Booksneeze, and let it sit on my shelf for two months while I took care of other promised reviews.

Stupid me. This is a fantastic book, intelligent and raw. Raw, not in the vulgar sense, but in the lead-you-to-the-edge-and-curl-your-lip sense. Then it will draw you back from the edge, like the scent of marsh mellow cocoa by a warm fire. Combine all that with a captivating writing style, and you have a winner.

Two men walked side-by-side one day twenty centuries ago, heads bowed, on the way to Emmaus. A stranger appeared asking why they were so downcast, and they marveled at the stranger’s ignorance of what was happening in Israel. The rabbi Jesus, the hope of their nation, had been rejected by God’s appointed leaders and then brutally killed by the Roman Empire.

Loconte draws us back to this first-century image of a pair of bewildered and beaten men over and over as he discusses the faith-shaking events within Christianity over the years. In so many ways, religion does seem like the poison that many believe it to be. Where is God in all this confusion? As Loconte walks us through the insanity of our world today, with its suffering and wars and occasional inhumanities, we’re tempted to ask the same question. The Searchers is a book about finding “faith in the valley of doubt.” It is a journey, not a book which can be surface-scanned, but one that requires walking in the shoes of others.

Note that this is not an apologetic book. The one little attempt to help us believe in the historicity of the resurrection seemed to me incognizant of the first-century Christian atmosphere, but I won’t dwell on it, because argument is not the focus of the book. Hope is. As we zero in on the close of the book, we’re once again reminded of those two men and their solemn journey home on the Emmaus road. The moment came when their eyes were opened to see the Lord, and for joy, they rushed back to Jerusalem. Hope lives!

Got an opinion? 2 comments

Acts 23:2-3, Paul Prophesies the Death of Ananias

Tuesday, August 28, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 1 comment

At this the high priest Ananias ordered those standing near Paul to strike him on the mouth. Then Paul said to him, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!”

//Paul, before the Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem, drew the ire of the high priest Ananias by claiming to be doing the will of God. So Ananias gave him a whack across the chops, and Paul responded that God would strike Ananias down. Paul was right.

Ananias developed a reputation for greed, violence and coercion with the Romans. This association with the Romans did not enamor him to Jewish nationalists, the Zealots, when war broke out with Rome. According to Jewish historian Josephus, the Zealots burned Ananias’ house and he was forced to flee to Herod’s palace. He was trapped while hiding in an aqueduct there on the palace grounds and killed.

Impressive forecast! But lest we give Paul too much credit, it must be remembered that these words in the book of Acts were written twenty or more years after Ananias died.

Got an opinion? 1 comment

2 Corinthians 7:8, The Lost Epistles of Paul

Monday, August 27, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Even if I caused you sorrow by my letter, I do not regret it.

//Paul (or others writing in the name of Paul) contributed more than half of the books in our New Testament. It’s striking how many of our Christian beliefs we’ve founded on the writings of one man—even a man as influential as Paul of Tarsus.

Yet scripture gives evidence of its own incompleteness. Paul wrote more letters that we haven’t yet uncovered, and may never find. We know of at least four missing letters from Paul, as referenced in the following verses:

I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people –1 Corinthians 5:9. Whatever this letter says, it’s evidence that 1 Corinthians wasn’t the first written to Corinth.

For I wrote you out of great distress and anguish of heart and with many tears, not to grieve you but to let you know the depth of my love for you. –2 Corinthians 2:4. This is thought to be the same letter as referenced in today’s verse from verse 7:8, dubbed the “Letter of tears.”

[T]he mystery made known to me by revelation, as I have already written briefly. –Ephesians 3:3. Whatever earlier writing Paul is referring to, it appears to have gone missing.

After this letter has been read to you, see that it is also read in the church of the Laodiceans and that you in turn read the letter from Laodicea. –Colossians 4:16 Paul appears to be asking Colosse to share their letter with Laodicea, and to get a copy from Laodicea that Paul had written to them. We have found no such Laodicean letter.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: Velvet Elvis

Sunday, August 26, 2012 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: Velvet Elvis

by Rob Bell

★★★★

Harper One appears to be doing a reprint of Rob Bell’s works, and sent me a nice little stack of books. So I’m beginning with Bell’s Cinderella work, Velvet Elvis, published back in 2005. I had actually never read it before. Had heard it talked about, but never turned the cover. It turns out to be a good book, but I really didn’t enjoy it as much as I did Bell’s latest, Love Wins. I’ll review that one shortly.

Velvet Elvis is written in a style exactly like I expect the young mega-church pastor to preach: friendly and colloquial, somewhat meandering, common-sensical. I don’t quite get the “Velvet Elvis” part, so let’s ignore the title and just say his is common-sense Christianity. It’s not terribly controversial (it’s actually more conservative than I expected), and it’s not theologically probing, but it’s clear Bell can think for himself … or rather, he can unthink some of the stray ideas that have led many Christians away from simply living a Christian life. I absolutely love this observation early in the book about what happens when you try to follow Jesus:

Over time when you purposefully try to live the way of Jesus, you start noticing something deeper going on. You begin realizing the reason this is the best way to live is that it is rooted in profound truths about how the world is. You find yourself living more and more in tune with ultimate reality. You are more and more in sync with how the universe is at its deepest levels.

What is Bell talking about? He’s talking about what it means to be a disciple of a first-century Rabbi who sees potential in each of us, and calls us to live like him. He’s talking about what happens when you quit pushing your religion on your neighbors and dwell like Christians among them. He’s talking about what happens when you view God’s dream for mankind as one of him coming down to make his home with us, rather than us peering into the heavens with a forlorn hope of rapturous escape. He’s talking about compassion, goodness, simplicity, all the things that can make this world a better place for all of us.

Got an opinion? 0 comments