Theological rants
of a liberal Christian

Book review: He Who Has an Ear

Saturday, February 1, 2014 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: He Who Has an Ear

by Laura J. Davis

★★★★

Caution to readers of this review: As a liberal Christian who promotes liberal Christian books, I am a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” who will be held accountable by God for deceiving Christians. That is Laura Davis’s reckoning, who calls for Christians to rightly discern doctrine by making sure it aligns with scripture.

Don’t worry, I didn’t just offend my new acquaintance. Davis actively promotes stringent intolerance as a Godly virtue, and couldn’t have picked a better book of the Bible for her foundation: that intolerant book of Revelation. Had she been writing about John’s Gospel, I could not have given it four stars. Her stance is quite consistent with the scriptures she reviews, and I appreciate that. Still, I doubt she realized my deep liberal stance before passing her book to me for review, nor did I realize her deep conservative stance when I requested it.

He Who Has an Ear covers the seven letters to the seven churches in chapters 2 and 3 of Revelation, and Davis provides a thorough exposition. I also have studied these letters, and the history of the cities to which they are addressed, so I can vouch for her accuracy and depth of research. Not so much for her Greek translation of words like apokteinō. The writing is interesting and engaging, so I enjoyed the book.

Davis then goes a step further and considers the impact of these letters, their promises and warnings, to today’s world. They were all written to churches which no longer exist, but might the letters have more relevance than we think 2,000 years later? Do you see your own church in any of them? (Yes, Laura, I do … I grew up in the church at Ephesus.) If so, the warnings of Jesus should be carefully heeded.

One place where I felt Davis’s treatment didn’t quite jibe with Revelation was her assumption that the gospel is about going to heaven. That the book of life is a list of people going to heaven. As best I can tell, Revelation doesn’t say anything at all about going to heaven, and instead suggests the afterlife will be lived on earth.

Then Laura begins chapter twelve with the words “I don’t think this chapter is going to win me any friends.” It’s her Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing List, where she lists the worst offenders by name. This chapter, too, is quite within the spirit of Revelation’s letters, where John of Patmos invokes the authority of God to condemn both churches and individuals: “Balaam,” “Jezebel,” “the Nicolaitans.” Laura’s list of baddies includes Joel Osteen, Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Rob Bell, and lots more.

I confess that I can find nothing very Christlike in a prosperity gospel (that would be folks like Joel Osteen), but I’d also be remiss if I didn’t challenge Davis’s conservative Bible understanding, since she makes it such a personal matter. Davis is “fascinated that Rob Bell ignores all mentions of hell in the Bible,” and wonders how he reconciles scriptures like Matthew 10:28, Matthew 23:33, Mark 9:43, Revelation 20:15. The answer is, Bell probably reads all of these in the context of first-century idioms and events as Bible scholars should, and recognizes that none of them really have anything to do with the doctrine of eternal punishment. Laura, if you really do want to know why many scholars read scripture differently than you do, I’d enjoy chatting with you about it.

Davis finally closes her book with precisely the promise made over and over to Revelation’s audience 2,000 years ago: “Jesus is coming soon.” A perfect ending. Her book is well-organized, thoughtful, and thought-provoking in a conservative way.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Revelation 20:14, The End of Death and Hades

Friday, January 31, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Revelation 20:14, The End of Death and Hades

Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

//In my book about Revelation, I assume that this verse symbolically presents the end of death … that death has been conquered. Hades, the holding place of the dead, is therefore no longer needed. It is emptied and discarded.

There is, however, a deeper way to read the verse. It is by referring back to the four horsemen, where Death and Hades are first introduced as villains:

So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it was Death, and Hades followed with him. And power was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger, with [disease], and by the beasts of the earth. –Revelation 6:8

Clearly “Death and Hades” are still to be understood symbolically, but does this change the meaning of their destruction?  Is it only the sword, hunger, disease and wild beasts that are conquered? Will people still die of old age after Death and Hades are conquered?

That would certainly radically change our understanding of the New Jerusalem!

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Romans 5:18, Adam and Christ

Thursday, January 30, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Romans 5:18, Adam and Christ

Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life.

//To understand the controversy over this verse, we must back up just a little and explain what Paul is talking about. He is naming Jesus as the second Adam. As Adam was the first man of the first age, so Jesus inaugurates a new age, and the impact of these two men on humanity is profound.

Paul wrote that all men fell into sin because of Adam, and the wages of sin is death. You may have heard of the theology of “original sin.” He then wrote that all men are saved, given new life, through Jesus. Paul uses “justification” language here and elsewhere to refer to our escape from the realm of sin and death into the realm of righteousness and life.

The argument is over this word “all.” Did all mankind fall into sin? Then Jesus saved all men, and everyone gets life eternal. Did Jesus manage to save only a portion of mankind? Then only some men fell into sin.

And round and round we go, trying to decide whether Jesus matches the influence of Adam.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

1 Timothy 6:16, The Immortal Soul

Wednesday, January 29, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 3 comments

1 Timothy 6:16, The Immortal Soul

… who [God] alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen.

//I was taught as I was growing up that I possessed an immortal soul. That this soul could not die, and after the body perished, it would continue living forever. Some souls went to heaven, some to hell.

Today’s verse presents a different opinion. It claims that only God is immortal. Man, who is not innately immortal, must seek to attain it:

To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. –Romans 2:7

God then gives eternal life (immortality) only to those able to believe. Does this leave hell out in the cold? Do the unsaved merely die, having not received the gift of immortality? Some theologians think so, on the basis of verses like the following:

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. –John 3:16

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. –John 10:28

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. –Romans 6:23

And this is the testimony: God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. –1 John 5:11-12

(To be fair, my own understanding of “eternal life” differs from the norm, so the verses don’t read quite the same to me as they may to you.)

Got an opinion? 3 comments

Book review: Powers of Darkness

Tuesday, January 28, 2014 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: Powers of Darkness

by Clinton E. Arnold

★★★★★

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. –Ephesians 6:12

This is a fascinating five-star book by a guy who believes in demons. He reasons that because belief in the spiritual world of demons and angels was prevalent among New Testament authors, we should believe the same today. In the preface, Arnold states “If we want help from the Bible for dealing with the problem of evil, we must be willing to take seriously what the Bible takes seriously: the intense involvement in life of a figure named Satan and his powers of darkness.” However, Arnold’s beliefs (other than the occasional call to take these things seriously) do not get in the way of excellent research into Biblical Demonology, and I thoroughly enjoyed his book.

I think Arnold is correct in stating that virtually everyone in Jesus’ day believed in such powers, and in astrological signs. Witches, demons, magic, divination, these things were to be feared and opposed. Angelic battles in heaven drove the fortunes of the nations they represented on earth.

By the time of Jesus, opposing gods were no longer considered on par with Yahweh, and were relegated to the level of demons or mere idols. The Serpent of Eden was unanimously equated with Satan by the early church (and still is today by many Christians). The church fathers strongly believed Satan himself animated the gods of the nations with his powers of darkness, based largely on the writings of Paul. (Note that Arnold takes the conservative approach of assuming Pauline authorship of all the letters traditionally ascribed to him, and that he leans quite heavily on the book of Ephesians.) Paul is not alone in emphasizing dark powers; the book of Acts records four instances of magic and divination, and Jesus often performed exorcisms, but Arnold’s study relates to Paul.

Unless you’ve studied the topic, many of Paul’s references to dark powers may not be obvious. All of the terms Paul used for the powers can be found in Jewish documents of the Greco-Roman period, so scholars agree on what they imply. The Testament of Adam lists the angelic powers according to their various orders, from the lowest to the highest. The lowest order is angels, followed by archangels, archons, authorities, powers, dominions, and then the high orders, thrones, seraphim and cherubim. Paul seemed unconcerned about rank and order, but used many of these words.

Only by really immersing yourself into first-century beliefs can the writings of Paul be put in perspective, and Arnold does this. His insistence that such dark powers surround us today brings Paul’s superstitious world even more alive. Great book.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Dubious Disciple Top Ten Books of 2013

Monday, January 27, 2014 in Awards | 0 comments

It’s about time I posted my favorite religion books of 2013. In order by review date, here are my top ten:

 

Faithest, by Chris Stedman

The Myth of Persecution, by Candida Moss

Chasing an Elusive God, by Ray Vincent

God or Godless, by John W. Loftus and Randal Rauser

Pastrix, by Nadia Bolz-Weber

Invitation to the New Testament, by Ben Witherington III

God in Slow Motion, by Mike Nappa

The Historical David: The Real Life of an Invented Hero, by Joel Baden

The Question of Canon, by Michael J. Kruger

All You Want To Know About Hell, by Steve Gregg

 

If you would like a closer look, click here: http://www.dubiousdisciple.com/top-10-books-of-2013

Got an opinion? 0 comments

John 5:19, The Nature of God

Sunday, January 26, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

John 5:19, The Nature of God

Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does.

//Do you ever wonder if it’s possible to discern the nature of God? Might some theological stumpers—such as whether or not a God of love could condemn someone to eternal conscious torment—be easier to answer, if only we could get a handle on what God is really like?

I have yet to hear of anyone who experiences God as a god of vengeance, but for some reason, personal experience does not seem convincing enough for those who still picture God as a stern judge. For such people, I point out the following: Jesus, multiple times in the Gospel of John, insisted that he could be recognized as the Son of God because of his nature. Today’s verse is an example. If Jesus is compassionate and forgiving, then so must be God. If Jesus is vengeful and unforgiving, then so must be God.

So what is Jesus’ nature? Perhaps this verse will help you decide:

And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left. Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. –Luke 23:33-34

Got an opinion? 2 comments

Romans 9:13, Is God Love?

Saturday, January 25, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Romans 9:13, Is God Love?

Just as it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”

//This is God talking. He loves who he wants to, and hates who he wants to. As he explained to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”

Enter Calvinism, which implies that God does not love everyone. God does not really love all men redemptively, nor does he really desire to save them. God chooses to save some, and passes on others, who are predestined to a lost eternity.

As Paul further explains in this passage,

It does not, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. For Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. –Romans 9:16-18

How does this jibe with the claim in 1 John that God is love? Examine this verse in particular:

And so we know and rely on the love God has for us. God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in them. –1 John 4:16

Attempting to harmonize scripture, we might reach the following conclusion: If you are able to love, then you have been chosen. If you are unable to love, too bad: you have apparently been predestined to hell.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: The Faith: What Christians Believe, Why They Believe It, and Why It Matters

Friday, January 24, 2014 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: The Faith: What Christians Believe, Why They Believe It, and Why It Matters

by Charles Colson and Harold Fickett

★★★

For anyone who hasn’t heard of the late Charles Colson, he was known as Richard Nixon’s “hatchet man,” convicted during the Watergate scandal. He pleaded guilty and served seven months in prison. Just before serving, he converted to Christianity and underwent a radical life conversion. He founded a prison ministry and authored perhaps two dozen books about Christianity.

In this book, Colson promises to explain what Christians believe, why, and why it matters. He succeeds in two out of three goals, describing conservative beliefs and how the beliefs transform lives. He doesn’t, however, explain very well why conservatives believe.

The book is in two parts, and the first part is painful, so bear with me until I get through this section. Hoping to explain why Christians believe the way he does, Colson instead highlights how differently many Christians really do believe. For example, a poll showed that “49 percent of Protestant pastors reject core biblical beliefs,” whatever that means. Colson is unfazed; he chops them out of the church, so they don’t count. One of his favorite phrases is “true Christians,” by which he means anyone who agrees with his “nonnegotiable, irreducible fundamentals of the Christian faith.”

Colson argues with emotional appeal. For instance, he writes about struggling with his children’s illnesses, questioning God’s love, and then stepping outside the hospital to see the beauty of creation. God Is, he immediately concludes, and the book transitions into a discussion of three possibilities: A godless universe; a pantheistic universe; and a personal God. But why does he neglect to consider the most obvious fit to his observation: Deism. Doesn’t his observation imply a creative creator who then ignores his creation?

Colson’s logic in this book seems to be that since the Bible is true, everything in it is true. The Bible is our rock, the ultimate authority, and because it came from God, it must certainly be true. And how do we know the Bible is literally true? Because “there has been no discovery proving the Bible false.” Sigh. Maybe the most obvious “fail” here is that archaeology has thoroughly debunked many of the claims of conquest in the book of Joshua. Elsewhere, Colson argues that Jesus’ resurrection must be true, because nobody has yet disproved it. I guess Elvis fans can take heart: Nobody has yet proved he’s dead, either.

Colson especially goes on the offensive against liberal Christianity, labeling it “institutionalized agnosticism,” “no better than paganism,” and insinuating that liberal Christians were responsible for Hitler’s eugenics movement. I can handle the anti-liberal posturing by people who misunderstand the nature of Christ. I’m quite used to that. But the first half of Colson’s book is little more than fundamentalist rhetoric.

After whittling the Christian community down to his own mold, he is ready to move on to part 2. But not before dissin’ even my man Einstein, claiming that Einstein detested the “religion of fear and morality” that a personal God brings (Einstein actually said something quite different … that development from a religion of fear TO moral religion was a great step forward, and he pointed to the Bible as evidence of that progression).

Anyway. On to part 2 where the intolerance continues but where it now mixes with some very inspiring words about how Christians are to live out their faith. This is where “why it matters” rings true, and this section raised my rating from one star to three. God’s favorites, Colson notes from scripture, are the poor, the destitute, the widowed, the fatherless, the sick, the prisoners, and anyone suffering injustice. So we choose sides. We choose love, and plunge into the battle between good and evil. Once on God’s side, we come to understand God’s point of view and position ourselves to experience God’s love and friendship in a whole new way.

This time, Colson is correct. He has identified the “true Christians.”

Got an opinion? 0 comments

1 Corinthians 3:8, Works vs Faith, according to Paul

Thursday, January 23, 2014 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

1 Corinthians 3:8, Works vs Faith, according to Paul

Each will receive his own reward according to his own labor. –1 Cor 3:8

//Many have the sort of mistaken idea that Paul taught we would be saved entirely by grace … or, as some put it, by faith … rather than by our works. That we could never earn our way into God’s favor. Indeed, it does seem that way, when you read verses like Romans 4:1-5. I discussed these verses yesterday, pointing out how Paul argued furiously that even Abraham was not righteous enough to earn God’s grace.

So are works worthless in Paul’s mind? Are we saved by faith instead of works? Here are some more verses Paul wrote to the Corinthians that might make you think twice:

Each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it because it is to be revealed with fire, and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. If any man’s work which he has built on it remains, he will receive a reward. –1 Cor 3:13-14

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. –2 Cor 5:10

Now this I say, he who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he who sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. –2 Cor 9:6

Therefore it is not surprising if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness, whose end will be according to their deeds. –2 Cor 11:15

Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life. –Gal 6:7-8

How do we reconcile this difference in Paul’s mind? Are we saved by faith or by works? I do not have the answer, but I recently read something that makes a lot of sense. In Paul & Judaism Revisited, by Preston M. Sprinkle, the suggestion is made that Paul recognizes two instances that require salvation: the initial inbreaking of the Kingdom and the final judgment. In relevant terms for today, we might say we are accepted by faith, but rewarded for our works once we begin walking with God.

Got an opinion? 0 comments