Theological rants
of a liberal Christian

Genesis 1:1, Did God Create the Universe?

Tuesday, January 17, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.

//In the beginning. The Greek word translated “beginning” can be either a verb or a noun; either “beginning” or “began.” It’s a toss-up. Either our Bible starts with “In the Beginning, God created …” or it starts with “When God began to create …” In the first, we have creation ex nihilo, out of nothing. But in the second, when God begins to create, the formless void of the earth is already there. Creation is the act of bringing stability to chaos.

This second interpretation actually fits better with other stories of creation in the Bible. For example, the book of Job, chapter 38, describes creation as a struggle between God and the primordial forces of chaos. God overcomes and controls a monstrous personification of the formless, watery deep that existed before the world began.

Psalm 74 also envisions creation as establishing cosmic order out of chaos:

It was you who split open the sea by your power; you broke the heads of the monster in the waters.
It was you who crushed the heads of Leviathan and gave him as food to the creatures of the desert.
It was you who opened up springs and streams; you dried up the ever flowing rivers.
The day is yours, and yours also the night; you established the sun and moon.

It was you who set all the boundaries of the earth; you made both summer and winter. –Psalm 74:13-17

In Proverbs chapter 8, God has a co-creator (wisdom), and this version of creation is reflected by the prologue of John’s Gospel (“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God”). But, again, the creation is a matter of setting boundaries for the sea, and fixing the foundations of the earth.

By all accounts, then, we have mistranslated Genesis 1:1. God did not create the universe; he merely brought order to a chaotic existence.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

1 Samuel 6:19, Don’t look in there!

Monday, January 16, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 3 comments

Then He struck the men of Beth Shemesh, because they had looked into the ark of the LORD. He struck fifty thousand and seventy men of the people, and the people lamented because the LORD had struck the people with a great slaughter.

//There’s some confusion in translating this verse; most ancient Hebrew texts read 70 men, not 5,070. Some say the correct reading is 70 men and 50 oxen.

But what’s the big deal? They peeked in the ark, and God struck them down. Shades of the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark (which does, indeed, draw themes from today’s verse).

Here’s the deal. The Law, capital L, resided within the ark. The tablets of the covenant, which Moses brought down the mountain from God, were frightening and often meant death. But sitting atop the ark was God’s “mercy seat,” and from there, from between two cherubim, God spoke to Moses (see Numbers 7:89). The Mercy Seat served as a covering for the ark, a reconciliation.

So, for the people to peek in the ark, they had to first remove its covering of mercy, exposing the Law’s undiluted, frightful power. Pow!

Got an opinion? 3 comments

Book review: What the Bible Really Tells Us

Sunday, January 15, 2012 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book review: What the Bible Really Tells Us

by T. J. Wray

★★★★★

Wray starts her book with a five-question quiz, which any faithful Bible reader should pass with ease, but the vast majority cannot. It’s the same quiz she uses to open each new course at Salve Regina University, where she teaches as an Associate Professor of Religious Studies. When she next recommends that I go purchase a Bible and read her book with the Bible open in front of me, I felt a nostalgic flashback to my University days. :)

After the pop quiz opening, I expected the book to be a Bible Introduction course, and I worried that perhaps it wouldn’t hold my interest. I was wrong. It’s true, Wray writes down to the level of readers who know little or nothing about the Bible, but her writing is insightful and fun. Wray “seeks to address the real and urgent problem of contemporary biblical illiteracy,” not by teaching us everything that’s in the Bible, but by stimulating a curiosity about it, so that we’ll read it for ourselves.

So this book is not a Bible overview. It is instead, after a short Bible Basics lead-in, an insightful discussion of seven critical issues that we should all find vital to our philosophy of life and spiritual well-being. Precisely the sort of instruction we expect to find by turning to our Bibles—yet most of us hold an erroneous assumption about what the Bible really says. These seven topics are:

[1] Why do we suffer?
[2] Heaven and hell
[3] What the Bible says about wealth and riches
[4] Sexuality and gender
[5] Biblical law and justice
[6] The Bible and the environment

[7] Prayer and worship

All seven proved to be great reading! Made me want to sign up for her class.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

1 Timothy 6:16, No one has ever seen God, part II of II

Friday, January 13, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

Who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen.

//Continuing the topic from yesterday, we’re talking about people who have “seen God.” 1 Timothy repeats the claim of John’s Gospel, noting that no man has seen nor can see God. But what exactly do these verses mean? Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Job, Samson’s parents, Isaiah, and Daniel all saw God in yesterday’s verses. Once, all the seventy elders of Israel saw God. We can’t just pretend that the writers of John’s Gospel and 1 Timothy didn’t know the scripture.

The reason no one has ever seen God, according to 1 Timothy, is because God lives in “unapproachable light.” This brings to mind the day Paul saw Jesus as a blinding light from heaven.

John, in similar fashion, makes the claim that no one has ever seen God in his prologue. I provided that verse yesterday.  There, Jesus is described as “the true light that gives light to every man.” The logical conclusion is that the many who had seen God before never witnessed the blinding glory of God, until Jesus arrived and put that glory on display. John then makes clear that the only way one really “sees” Jesus is to be born again … to receive new sight.

It turns out that there is one more verse on this topic:

1 John 4:12, No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.

Putting it all together, may we conclude that no one in the Old Testament had “seen” God, but thanks to the coming of Jesus, every loving Christian since that day has?

Got an opinion? 2 comments

John 1:18, No one has ever seen God, part I of II

Thursday, January 12, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.

//Here’s an interesting topic. Is it true that nobody has ever seen God? I would enjoy hearing your thoughts after I post the second half tomorrow. Let me start the topic by presenting a list of verses where people DID see God:

Genesis 32:30, So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, “It is because I saw God face to face, and yet my life was spared.”

Exodus 24:9-11, Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and the seventy elders of Israel went up and saw the God of Israel. Under his feet was something like a pavement made of sapphire, clear as the sky itself. But God did not raise his hand against these leaders of the Israelites; they saw God, and they ate and drank.

Genesis 17:1, When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to him and said, “I am God Almighty; walk before me and be blameless.

Exodus 33:21-22, “Then I will remove my hand and you will see my back; but my face must not be seen.” When my glory passes by, I will put you in a cleft in the rock and cover you with my hand until I have passed by. (Y’all recognize this as God speaking to Moses, right?)

Numbers 12:7-8, But this is not true of my servant Moses; he is faithful in all my house. With him I speak face to face, clearly and not in riddles; he sees the form of the LORD. (See also Exodus 33:11)

Judges 13:22, “We are doomed to die!” [Samson’s father] said to his wife. “We have seen God!”

Job 42:5, My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.

Isaiah 6:1, In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord seated on a throne, high and exalted, and the train of his robe filled the temple.

Daniel 7:9, “As I looked, thrones were set in place, and the Ancient of Days took his seat. His clothing was as white as snow; the hair of his head was white like wool. His throne was flaming with fire, and its wheels were all ablaze.”

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book review: Banned Questions about Jesus

Wednesday, January 11, 2012 in Book Reviews | 2 comments

Book review: Banned Questions about Jesus

by Christian Piatt and others

★★★★★

Let me say first that this is shaping up into a great series! This is the second book, following closely on the heels of Banned Questions About the Bible. As with book one, Piatt’s MO here is to collect a number of uncomfortable questions, typically issues that we would feel awkward about discussing with our pastor, and then pose the questions to contributors. There are fifty questions in each book.

While it deserves a five-star review in its own way, I found the second book a little different in flavor from the first. Book two is more inspiring and comforting, less thought-provoking. Less puzzle-solving and more opinions. Or maybe it just seemed that way.

Partly, the differing flavor is because some of the questions are simply impossible to answer with only a Bible in your hand! Was Jesus ever sick? How soon did he know he was divine? Was he ever wrong? Yeah, we all want answers to these questions, but who’s got them? Contributors in book two are forced to dig inside themselves, and discover what Jesus’ life really means.

But the book has its theological doozies as well. When Jesus participates in the Last Supper, doesn’t that mean he’s eating his own body and drinking his own blood? If Jesus had to die in order to save us from sin, how did he get away with forgiving people of their sin before he died?

As with book one, I loved it and hope to see the series continue!

Got an opinion? 2 comments

Matthew 7:24-27, Jesus, the Rabbi

Tuesday, January 10, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

“Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.”

//Scholars have often pointed out that the sayings of Jesus often mimic those of the rabbis. I’ve even heard the Jewish opinion that “anything good in the gospels is nothing new; anything new is nothing good.” If you thought Jesus’ manner of speaking in parables was unique for his times, that’s just not true; Jewish literature preserves more than four thousand rabbinic parables. Today’s verses may be a derivation of one such rabbinic saying:

A person in whom there are good deeds and who has studied the Torah extensively, what is he like? A man who builds first [of] stones and then afterwards [of] mud bricks. Even if a large quantity of water were to collect beside the stones, it would not destroy them. But a person in whom there are not good deeds, though he has studied Torah, what is he like? A man who builds first [of] mud bricks and then afterwards [of] stones. Even if only a little water collects, it immediately undermines them.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Jeremiah 23:5, Jesus, the Branch

Monday, January 9, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 0 comments

Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.

//A branch? (Hebrew: nazar). Who wants to be governed by a branch?

Jeremiah means, of course, a descendant of David, and this was indeed a strong expectation of the coming Messiah. He must have the blood of the great warrior-king David surging through him.

Fast-forward to the book of Matthew, and this curious verse about Jesus (Mat. 2:23): And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. Where did Matthew get this curious idea, that the prophets promised a Nazarene? What is a Nazarene, anyway?

It certainly isn’t someone from Nazareth, or at least it didn’t used to be. Rather, the word probably stems from the Hebrew word nazar, or branch, and may have been Matthew’s own creation. Because, as we all know, Jesus was supposed to come from Bethlehem, not his true hometown of Nazareth. Matthew’s play on words ingeniously excuses Jesus’ Galilean origins inNazareth.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

Book Review: Hebrews: From Flawed to Flawless Fulfilled!

Sunday, January 8, 2012 in Book Reviews | 0 comments

Book Review: Hebrews: From Flawed to Flawless Fulfilled!

by T. Everett Denton

★★★★

A good exposition! But before delving into the book’s emphasis, maybe I should lay out its axiomatic suppositions. Denton writes from the perspective that Hebrews was authored by the apostle Paul, sometime in the early 60’s. He presents a minimal argument for Paul as the writer (an exhaustive argument would be outside the scope of the book), and this forces the authorship of Hebrews to pre-war days.

Without known authorship, the dating of Hebrews is difficult, made doubly so because much of its focus is in comparing Christ to the Jewish priesthood. Hebrews sometimes appears to be saying the priesthood still exists (thus, its writing must be dated before 70 A.D.), and sometimes appears to be saying the priesthood has been disbanded (therefore written after the war, when the Temple was leveled). Compare verse 7:23 with 8:4 for an example. I think Denton’s stance is that Hebrews was originally written from a pre-war perspective, but later redactors, after the war, changed the reading to reflect a post-war perspective … and missed a few passages. If I’ve misunderstood, I apologize!

Denton’s argument may be reasonable, but I do want to point out that it’s daring; most Bible scholars date the book of Hebrews to the mid-80s, believing that it reflects a period of persecution, probably under Domitian, and a post-war let-down, when some of the Jewish Christians dreamed of returning to Judaism after Christ failed to reappear. This, if correct, means it cannot be written by Paul.

Pauline authorship, however, allows Denton to evaluate many of Hebrew’s passages under the light of Paul’s letters. For example, he can compare the New Covenant with the New Jerusalem (Galatians 4:24-26). It also turns the many references to the fall of the priesthood into prophecies, not explanations. Paul, as we know, had an uncanny sense of impending doom, and was proven right.

Denton’s eschatology also differs from the traditional futuristic view. The Heavenly Jerusalem (Hebrews 12:12) is not some city in the sky, it’s a spiritual kingdom, the New Testament kingdom.

Now that you understand the premise of Denton’s writing, I have to say it’s very good. You’ll appreciate Denton’s research regardless of your own beliefs. Hebrews’ hangup about Melchizedek finally makes sense. Hebrews’ theme of Christ bringing a superior kingdom, in every way, stands out. More than a verse-by-verse exposition, this is essentially a word-by-word exposition! The writing isn’t as smooth as I would have liked—it reads a little like a collection of notes—but it’s easy to follow. The research is deep and meaningful, and you’ll be keeping it handy as a reference long after you’re done reading.

Got an opinion? 0 comments

1 Chronicles 21:5, That’s a big army!

Saturday, January 7, 2012 in Bible Commentary | 2 comments

Joab reported the number of the fighting men to David: In all Israel there were one million one hundred thousand men who could handle a sword, including four hundred and seventy thousand in Judah.

//Here’s David’s army that day: 1,100,000 from Israel and 470,000 from Judah. 

Wikipedia lists the number of current, active-duty soldiers in the United States armed forces at 1.4 million. In other words, David, a little tribal king in 1,000 B.C., has a larger army than the United States of America does today!

A bit later, Abijah stands on a little rolling hill and addresses two opposing armies: one with 400,000 fighting men, the other with twice that many. That’s 1,200,000 listeners, and no sound system. Abijah must have had quite a big voice!

Are you impressed? Don’t be. Revelation says that in the great war of Armageddon, an army of 200,000,000 will be defeated. That’s 142 times the size of the U.S. forces!

There’s no way in the world Bible writers meant their numbers to be read literally. They are highly exaggerated and meant to make a point.

Got an opinion? 2 comments