2 Timothy 2:17-18 Has the Resurrection Already Happened?
And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
//I was asked today what this verse is all about, and how anybody could possibly believe the resurrection had already happened. The fact is, there were a number of versions of Christianity in the first couple centuries, and this is one of the things Christians argued about.
Paul believed the general resurrection had begun. He argues his case quite simply in his first letter to the Corinthians. Do you believe Jesus has risen from the dead? Then the resurrection has begun. Do you believe the resurrection has not begun? Then Jesus couldn’t have risen from the dead. Paul cannot imagine that Jesus’ resurrection could be an isolated event. He describes Jesus as the “first fruit” … that is, the first of many to rise into a glorious new resurrection body.
So did Paul believe others had been resurrected, too? Possibly, or more likely he felt he was living on the cusp on the general resurrection. You see, another of the things early Christians argued about was what the resurrection body is like. Some believed Jesus was resurrected in body; see Matthew and Luke for evidence of this belief. The final chapter in John and the last section of Mark also portray this physical resurrection, though neither is authentic to the original writing (both stories were added at a later date, apparently to bolster belief in bodily resurrection).
Paul didn’t see it this way. He felt he saw the resurrected Jesus just as clearly as anyone else did, and what he saw was no physical body. He saw a light from heaven. A spiritual body. Paul is adamant that the new, resurrected body, whether of Jesus or of any other believer, is not “of the flesh.”
Given that Christians could not even agree on what the resurrected body of Jesus was like, it’s hardly surprising that arguments arose in the first couple centuries of Christianity about what the general resurrection was like, whether it had begun, and what the new messianic age meant.
2 Kings 10:30, The Slaughter of Jezreel
The LORD said to Jehu, “Because you have done well in accomplishing what is right in my eyes and have done to the house of Ahab all I had in mind to do, your descendants will sit on the throne of Israel to the fourth generation.”
//Religion is often evoked as a means of providing meaning to life’s mysteries. We find a $100 bill on the street? God knew we needed the money. We lose that $100 bill later? God took it back to test us. Whether in reward or punishment, “God” is the explanation assumed when none other exists.
Bible writers were not immune to this tendency, either. Consider the house of Jehu, king of Israel. Jehu’s claim to fame may be his slaughter of the house of Ahab, in Jezreel. Jehu demanded that the elders and officials in Jezreel bring to him the heads of the seventy children of king Ahab. In fear, Jezreel followed Jehu’s orders, and Jehu dumped the seventy heads at the city gate, to serve as evidence that God was against Ahab. Then Jehu went and slaughtered everyone in Jezreel that remained of the house of Ahab.
Jehu’s descendents continued to reign after his death for four more generations: Jehoahaz, Jehoash, Jereboam II, and Zachariah. But then Shallum, son of Jabesh, “conspired against Zachariah, and smote him before the people, and slew him, and reigned in his stead.”
Now, the book of Kings sees this continued kingship through the decedents of Jehu as evidence of God’s approval. Read again today’s verse; Jehu did what was right, so God rewarded him. But the prophet Hosea sees the same event, the slaughter of Jezreel, in a different light. Hosea sees the abrupt end of Jehu’s kingship four generations later, and of Israel itself, as evidence that God disapproved of Jehu:
Hosea 1:4, Then the LORD said to Hosea, “Call him Jezreel, because I will soon punish the house of Jehu for the massacre at Jezreel, and I will put an end to the kingdom of Israel.
So, did God approve or disapprove of Jehu? Did God indicate his approval through reward or his disapproval through destruction? Different points of view render different conclusions.
Luke 24:7, Why three days in the grave?
The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.
//If you’ve ever wondered at the significance of “three days,” you may find meaning in The Midrash on Psalm 22 to Esther. You may remember her words as she prepared to meet the king: “Go, gather together all the Jews who are in Susa, and fast for me. Do not eat or drink for three days, night or day. I and my maids will fast as you do. When this is done, I will go to the king, even though it is against the law. And if I perish, I perish.”
Says the Midrash, the reason for three days is for the sake of Israel. “Why three days? Because the Holy One—blessed be he!—never leaves Israel in anguish for more than three days.” A number of other Bible passages agree:
Genesis 22:4, On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. Abraham had set out on a three-day journey, the end of which would end in the sacrifice of his son.
Genesis 42:17, And he put them all in custody for three days. Joseph, in Egypt, has accused his brothers of being spies, and imprisoned them.
Exodus 15:22, Then Moses led Israel from the Red Sea and they went into the Desert of Shur. For three days they traveled in the desert without finding water.
2 Kings 20:5, “Go back and tell Hezekiah, the leader of my people, ‘This is what the LORD, the God of your father David, says: I have heard your prayer and seen your tears; I will heal you. On the third day from now you will go up to the temple of the LORD. Hezekiah was ill, at the point of death, and was told he must wait three days before God would heal him.
Joshua 2:16, Now she had said to them, “Go to the hills so the pursuers will not find you. Hide yourselves there three days until they return, and then go on your way.” Said by Rahab, to the men she helped escape.
Jonah 2:1, From inside the fish Jonah prayed to the LORD his God. I needn’t remind you that Jonah spent three days there.
Hosea 6:2, After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence.
Deuteronomy 32:43, Was Israel Polytheistic?
“Praise his people, O you nations; for he avenges the blood of his servants, and takes vengeance on his adversaries, and makes expiation for the land of his people.”
//There’s a rather heated argument between conservative and liberal Christians as to whether Judaism was monotheistic from their very beginning, or whether the scriptures hint that Israel’s earliest traditions were polytheistic. A number of archaeological finds suggest worship (or at least recognition) of multiple gods in Israel, and a number of verses in the Bible speak of “gods” or “sons of God” or “the council of gods.” Not the least among these is God’s own jealous directive in the ten commandments that his people worship no other gods besides him. It seems Yahweh (Jehovah) was not considered the only god, he was merely the patron god of Israel, considered by them to be the High God.
Enter today’s quote. It’s a verse of praise for the Hebrew god, as quoted from the RSV (Revised Standard Version), and it matches pretty closely to what you may be familiar with in the Kings James Version. But the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the 20th century has shaken our world. Before this discovery, the oldest Hebrew manuscripts of the Bible wereMasoretic texts dating to 10th century CE. The biblical manuscripts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls push that date back over 1,000 years to the 2nd century BCE! That’s 1,000 years closer to the original words of the Hebrew Bible.
Consequently, when the NRSV (New Revised Standard Version) was published in 1989, this verse was corrected to reflect its more original wording, and now it reads very differently:
worship him, all you gods!
For he will avenge the blood of his children,
and take vengeance on his adversaries;
he will repay those who hate him,
and cleanse the land for his people.
Daniel 8:9-11, Typological Fulfillment
Out of one of them came another horn, which started small but grew in power to the south and to the east and toward the Beautiful Land. It grew until it reached the host of the heavens, and it threw some of the starry host down to the earth and trampled on them. It set itself up to be as great as the Prince of the host; it took away the daily sacrifice from him, and the place of his sanctuary was brought low.
//When Isaiah prophesied that a child would be born of “a young maiden” (the Septuagint version reads “a virgin”), he probably had in mind the birth of either his own son or that of King Ahaz. When you read the verse in context, the immediacy of the prophecy is very clear. Isaiah did not have Jesus in mind, and if Isaiah’s prophecy was fulfilled at all, then it was fully fulfilled in his own time.
Matthew, however, when he references Isaiah’s prophecy, may have considered this a typological fulfillment. It strains the imagination to think that Matthew didn’t know Isaiah’s prophecy had been fulfilled long ago, so we must assume Matthew meant its second fulfillment to be typological. The son of the King, in Isaiah, becomes a “type” of the birth of Jesus. The question readers must answer for themselves is this: Do you accept typological fulfillment as true prophecy?
Today’s verse is another example, of primary importance to today’s time. Without getting too deeply into the discussion, Daniel prophesied a conqueror, and this prophecy was fully fulfilled in the 2nd century BC. The name of the conqueror was Antiochus IV. John of Patmos then later picked up on Daniel’s prophecy and applied it to the conqueror of his time: Nero Caesar. Nearly all scholars of Revelation recognize Nero Caesar as the Beast of the Sea in Revelation. John’s prophecy, if taken seriously, must also be considered a typology; Daniel had no intention of prophesying an event in the first century.
But if typological fulfillment is legitimate, how, then, are we to know when a prophecy is fulfilled in its final expectation? I guess we don’t, really. As regards Daniel’s prophecy of a conqueror, Preterists stop at the first century, and conclude that Nero Caesar, and the great war of 67-70 A.D., is the final typological fulfillment of his scripture. It’s written about in Revelation. However, most Christians take the futurist view, and conclude that the prophecy of Daniel will be fulfilled yet a third time; that it will all happen again in our future, at Armageddon. Daniel had no idea his prophecy regarding the 2nd century B.C. would be read in this manner; John had no idea his prophecy regarding the 1st century A.D. would be read in this manner; yet both events were laying down a typological foundation for an antichrist and a great war yet to come.
The flexibility of scriptural fulfillment, and the way the New Testament has taught us to think typologically, means there will always be argument about when prophecies are fulfilled. What makes us think, for example, that the next antichrist will be the final one? In my opinion, the great debate between Preterists and Futurists about whether Christ is coming again may as well be put to bed. Neither are referringto the original scriptural fulfillment of Daniel, so both are arbitrarily choosing a particular point in time to end the cycle of repeating typological fulfillments.
Luke 12:47-48, The Punishment Fits the Crime
That servant who knows his master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows.
//Ignoring for now the Catholic doctrine of purgatory, traditional Christian teaching insists that all men who reject Jesus will suffer identically; that is, they will endure eternal torture together in the same hell. Mass murderers suffer the same torment as unbelievers. Have you ever wondered how a merciful God could possibly judge this way?
Perhaps Hell isn’t eternal; maybe the punishment fits the crime. Here are some verses that may give you pause:
But I tell you, it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you. –Matthew 11:22
But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.” –Mark 14:21
They devour widows’ houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. Such men will be punished most severely.” – Luke 20:47, see also Mark 12:40
God “will give to each person according to what he has done.” –Romans 2:6, see also Psalms 62:12 and Proverbs 24:12
How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? –Hebrews 10:29
2 Kings 3:26-27, Human sacrifice really works!
When the king of Moab saw that the battle had gone against him, he took with him seven hundred swordsmen to break through to the king of Edom, but they failed. Then he took his firstborn son, who was to succeed him as king, and offered him as a sacrifice on the city wall. The fury against Israel was great; they withdrew and returned to their own land.
//A bit of context: King “Jumping Jehoshaphat” asks Elisha the prophet whether or not he will be victorious in a battle against Moab. Elisha calls for a harpist (music seems to aid his visionary abilities) and while the music is playing God speaks to Elisha, promising victory. So the battle begins, in which Moab is at first routed. But then Moab turns the tables with a surprising counterstrike.
Many of my blog post ideas derive from the books I review. This idea comes from David Plotz’s Good Book, and Plotz is such a fun writer that I’d feel silly paraphrasing him. I’m going to invoke my privilege as a book reviewer, and just quote Good Book:
“The besieged Moabite king, on the verge of defeat, sacrifices his firstborn son as a burnt offering in plain sight of the Israelites. This turns the tide of the battle, and the Israelites flee. The theology here befuddles me. If the Moabite made his child a sacrifice to his own god, not the Lord, then it shouldn’t have helped, since rival gods are presumably impotent. If the Moabite king made the sacrifice to the Lord, that shouldn’t have helped either, because the Lord has made it very clear that he loathes child sacrifice. The only theory that makes sense is that the child sacrifice did not work theologically, but did work strategically. It scares the heck out of the Israelites, who figure: If he’ll do that to his own son, can you imagine what he’d do to us?”
David’s book: http://www.dubiousdisciple.com/2011/06/book-review-good-book.html
Revelation 6:12-14, The End of the World?
I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair, the whole moon turned blood red, and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as late figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind. The sky receded like a scroll, rolling up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.
//A number of Revelation interpreters continue to read these verses literally. Please don’t. Such images may seem bizarre to us today, but they had grown into common symbolism long before Revelation appeared. They denote the wrapping up of a nation, such as Babylon (as told by Isaiah) and Egypt (by Ezekiel). For example, Isaiah 34:4 reads, “All the stars of the heavens will be dissolved and the sky rolled up like a scroll; all the starry host will fall like withered leaves from the vine, like shriveled figs from the fig tree,” and this has nothing to do with the end of the world. If you doubt this, please take time to verify for yourself: Isaiah 13:1, 13:19, 14:22, 21:9, 48:14, 48:20. See also the “little apocalypse” describing the fall of Jerusalem in Mark 13:24-27 and the other Synoptic Gospels.
This apocalyptic imagery probably evolved from an ancient hymn to the storm god, Baal, describing his advance into combat:
As the fig droops
In the case of Revelation and the Gospels, the imagery surely signifies the end of the Jewish state in 70 A.D., which would not be restored again for nearly 1,900 years! More about Revelation’s symbolic roots can be found in my book, at http://www.thewayithappened.com
Matthew 5:22-23, the raising of Jairus’ daughter
Then one of the synagogue rulers, named Jairus, came there. Seeing Jesus, he fell at his feet and pleaded earnestly with him, “My little daughter is dying. Please come and put your hands on her so that she will be healed and live.”
//Jesus agrees. Word comes shortly that it’s too late–the girl has died–yet when Jesus arrives and examines the girl, he finds her still alive. He went in and said to them, “Why all this commotion and wailing? The child is not dead but asleep.”
Luke concurs. Jairus tells Jesus his daughter is deathly sick, and then she appears to die before Jesus gets there, but Jesus asserts that she merely sleeps, and wakes her up.
Matthew’s version varies a little. Jairus comes to Jesus already claiming that his daughter has died; Jairus isn’t asking for a healing or resuscitation, but a resurrection. Matthew 9:18, While he was saying this, a ruler came and knelt before him and said, “My daughter has just died. But come and put your hand on her, and she will live.”
Jesus does just that. But what’s the true story? Is she dead or just sleeping? Jesus is careful to allow no one in the room but his closest disciples as he revives the young girl, so who knows what magic he performed. But this we do know: the story of Jairus’ daughter carefully mimics an Old Testament passage.
It’s taken from II Kings 4:31-37, where a Shunnamite woman’s only son died. Jairus entreats Jesus in the same manner the woman entreats Elisha, falling at his feet and begging several times. Matthew changes the Jairus story slightly to align with the Old Testament source, by saying the daughter of Jairus is already dead.
A logical conclusion, then, is that Jesus did indeed perform a resuscitation of sorts, with his closest, most trustworthy disciples attending, and that these disciples allowed the story to grow legendary … while never stating that she actually died. In time the story took on the flavor of a common Old Testament resurrection.
Matthew 11:2-3, When did John the Baptist learn Jesus was the Messiah?
When John heard in prison what Christ was doing, he sent his disciples to ask him, “Are you the one who was to come, or should we expect someone else?”
//In trying to figure out how and when John learned of Jesus’ Messiahship, we have on record two primary events: Jesus’ baptism, and John’s imprisonment. Let’s start with the latter. Today’s verse, in Matthew, indicates that John, sitting in prison, had not yet heard of the Messiah’s arrival. However, John 1:29 reads differently:
The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!”
But two chapters later in John 3:24 makes it clear that “This was before John was put in prison.” So John’s Gospel insists the Baptist knew about Jesus before prison, while Matthew says he learned about him only after being imprisoned. But wait. It gets even more complicated. Reading now about Jesus’ baptism:
Matthew 3:13-14, Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. But John tried to deter him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?”
Doesn’t this seem to indicate that the Baptizer knew about Jesus before baptizing him? That’s Matthew’s version. If we read the story in John’s Gospel, we get a different story:
John 1:31-33, “I myself did not know [Jesus], but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel.” Then John gave this testimony: “I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.'”
Clearly, in this version, the Baptist didn’t know about Jesus until after he had baptized him.
Oh, what a tangled web. If we must choose between Matthew and John, John’s story at least makes chronological sense.
Joel 3:10, Beat your plowshares into swords
Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears.
//Here’s an absolutely fascinating comparison of two opposing opinions about what the final days will be like.
In the day of the Lord’s arrival, says Joel, God’s mountain will be holy. “The mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of Shittim.” All will be well in the Kingdom to come. And how will God’s righteous reign be ushered in?
By force. By beating plowshares into swords, and pruninghooks into spears. God calls the nations together to war, so that he may cleanse the earth of wrongdoers.
Isaiah shares Joel’s dream of a Kingdom to come. In the last days, according to Isaiah chapter 2, “The mountain of the LORD’S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.” Again, as in Joel’s dream for the future, God calls upon the nations, and asks them to…
Isaiah 2:4, Beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks. In this version of God’s holy reign, “nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”
Hmmm. Which would you choose?
Isaiah 13:6, The day is at hand
Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is at hand;
//Well, we all survived Camping’s prediction that the world was coming to an end. How many doomsday dates have come and gone, now? I have no idea, but entire religions have been founded on this promise, that the time has arrived for the Lord’s appearing. And it will be frightening indeed.
We’ve all read Revelation’s promise that the time is ripe. Revelation promises over and over that it’s just around the corner, and it will be bloody.
Paul, too, believed the world teetered on the edge. The day would come while some who heard his words yet lived, and it would be awesome.
John the Baptist taught this. Jesus taught this.
Matthew 4:17, From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
It seems to be a long-standing tradition, dating back to the earliest prophets.
Zephaniah 1:7, Hold thy peace at the presence of the Lord GOD: for the day of the LORD is at hand
Joel 1:15, Alas for the day! for the day of the LORD is at hand
Any day now, guys.
Matthew 10:2, who were the Twelve Apostles?
Now the names of the twelve apostles are these;
//I won’t bore you with the rest of the verse. You probably won’t recognize some of the names anyway. Ever hear of Lebbaeus?
The four gospels, the book of Acts, and Paul all agree there were twelve. In fact, they insist. Twelve men, to govern the twelve tribes of Israel when the Messiah returns. But who are these twelve men?
Different writers give different lists, and this has led to endless research, tracking down just exactly who is whom. Here’s the full collection, borrowed from the Skeptic’s Annotated Bible, if you’d like to try your hand at this exercise.
APOSTLES of JESUS |
MAT
|
MAR
|
LUK
|
JOH
|
ACT
|
GAL
|
|
1
|
ANDREW |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||
2
|
BARTHOLOMEW |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||
3
|
JAMES ALPHAEUS |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||
4
|
JAMES, BROTHER of JESUS |
X
|
|||||
5
|
JAMES ZEBEDEE |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
6
|
JOHN ZEBEDEE |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
7
|
JUDAS, BROTHER of JAMES |
X
|
X
|
||||
8
|
JUDAS ISCARIOT, SON of SIMON |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||
9
|
JUDAS, NOT ISCARIOT |
X
|
X
|
||||
10
|
LABBAEUS THADDEUS |
X
|
X
|
||||
11
|
LEVI ALPHAEUS, the PUBLICAN |
X
|
X
|
||||
12
|
MATTHEW, the PUBLICAN |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||
13
|
NATHANAEL of CANA |
X
|
|||||
14
|
NICODEMUS? |
?
|
|||||
15
|
PHILIP |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
16
|
SIMON PETER |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
17
|
SIMON the CANAANITE |
X
|
X
|
||||
18
|
SIMON ZELOTES |
X
|
X
|
||||
19
|
THOMAS DIDYMUS |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Revelation 16:16, The Battle of Armageddon
Then they gathered the kings together to the place that in Hebrew is called Armageddon.
//Revelation tells us that an army numbering 200,000,000 people will be defeated on the plains of Armageddon. “Armageddon” derives from a Greek pronunciation of the “mountain of Megiddo” located north of Jerusalem. Revelation’s prophecy places the battle in the plain of Megiddo near Mount Carmel (no Mount Megiddo exists). In antiquity, all roads connecting Africa with Asia and Europe passed near Megiddo. Seven major passes entered the valley. Its strategic position ensured that many important battles would be fought there—over 250—in the valley under the mountain.
One could surmise that this appears to be a God-chosen battleground. Both Gideon and Deborah, judges of old, earned a victory there. In that valley King Josiah, King Ahaziah, and King Saul perished.
Here’s what makes this valley fascinating to me. It’s literally in the backyard of Nazareth. Jesus would have walked across this valley many times, perhaps musing on the promise that “all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword.” This famous valley where so much blood was shed may have influenced the humanitarian teachings of our Prince of Peace.
John 13:5, The Johannine Passover
After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.
//I’ve mentioned in multiple posts how, in John’s Gospel, Jesus dies before the Passover, and thus does not share a Passover meal with his disciples. But this is not quite true. While Jesus does, indeed, die the afternoon before the Passover begins, there is still a Passover ritual of sorts. It’s just spiritual, not literal.
The setting of today’s verse seems to be a Johannine version of the “Last Supper,” which verse 15:1 explains occurs before the Passover. The Last Supper is not a Passover meal in this Gospel.
In John, Jesus interrupts the evening supper, his final meal with the apostles, to perform a foot-washing ritual. What’s interesting about this is that a ritual washing of hands is part of the Passover ceremony. One of the family members brings a water bowl and towel to each person, and pours water over their hands in purification. It occurs before the meal, not during, and Jesus has transposed this from hand-washing to foot-washing. But are we supposed to recognize the parallel to the Passover ritual? Let’s go on with the story.
John, the beloved disciple reclines on Jesus’ breast, just as the youngest member of the household often reclines on the leader of the Passover celebration. As the Passover appetizers are shared, this child begins to ask rehearsed questions, prompting the lesson of the Passover. In our case, Jesus has just shared with them the news that he would be betrayed. So, John, probably the youngest, asks questions. Verse 25: Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, “Lord, who is it?”
The Passover parallel continues. Shortly after the time of questions and the sharing of a cup of redemption, Matzah is dipped in bitter horseradish. According to revered first-century rabbi Hillel, enough of the bitter herb should be taken to bring tears to the eyes. Verse 26: Jesus answered, “It is the one to whom I will give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish.” Then, dipping the piece of bread, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, son of Simon.
Immediately after this Passover ritual, one or more members are supposed to be dispatched to serve the meal: the Passover lamb. So, in verse 27: As soon as Judas took the bread, Satan entered into him. “What you are about to do, do quickly,” Jesus told him.
Can you guess what happens next? Who the Passover lamb is? Aw, I think you already know.
Matthew 6:11, Our Daily Bread
Give us this day our daily bread.
//The “Our Father,” or the “Lord’s Prayer,” may be the most memorized of all scripture. Millions repeat this uplifting prayer of Jesus on a daily basis. But do you know what it is you’re praying for as you speak these words?
The story begins back in Exodus. When the Children of Israel escaped from Egypt, they grew hungry, and God fed them with miracle food. Manna. Daily bread from heaven, the “food of angels.” So impressive was this daily bread that Jews began to yearn for the bread of angels again. Many of the rabbis taught that in the age to come, what they called the “Messianic age,” God would again provide bread from heaven. No one would ever go hungry.
One day, Jesus fed a multitude with loaves and fishes, but they weren’t satisfied. They begged for another miracle; they reminded Jesus that their fathers ate manna from heaven. This wish for the Messianic age to be ushered in with “angel food” was alive and well in Jesus’ day.
Now we come to this prayer of Jesus. Give us this day our epiousios bread. The Greek word epiousios is what scholars call a neologism (a “new word”). It occurs for the first time here in the Lord’s Prayer. This makes it very difficult for scholars to determine exactly what was meant.
Some suggest the word means “for the current time.” Others interpret it as “for the coming” day. Still others read it as “for existence.” But if you break the word up into its two main parts, epi means “above,” and ousia means “substance.” Putting them together renders something akin to “supernatural substance.” It is, I believe, a direct reference to the end-of-days anticipation of divine food, the daily provision from God, that we may live forever.
Christians who utter this prayer are begging for the beginning of the era of God’s rule, when all people will live in harmony and all will be filled. This is further made clear by the request, “thy Kingdom come.”
Proverbs 15:3, Don’t make me come down there!
The eyes of the LORD are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good.
//God’s omniscience is a matter all Christians understand. From a little child, we’re taught that God is watching us. Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight, promises the book of Hebrews. But when did God develop this omniscience?
You might remember God playing hide-and-seek with Adam and Eve in the garden. “Where art thou?” God asked. No omniscience yet. Or the little plea bargain Abraham had with God. God was about to destroy Sodom because of their wickedness. Says God, “I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.” Abraham says, “but what if you find fifty righteous men? Will you still destroy the city?” God says, “if I find fifty there, I won’t destroy the city.” It goes on, God promising he’ll count carefully when he gets down there.
We can’t expect God to notice everything that happens down here, can we? In Hosea 8:4, God confesses, “They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not.” Still no omniscience.
But things have changed since then. My advice: Don’t count on your sins going unnoticed anymore. Just as a young mother begins to grow eyes in the back of her head, God has over time developed the same skill.
John 1:18, God the Son
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
//Today’s verse is a sticky one, very difficult to translate … but incredibly important. At the crux of this interpretation may be a question that Christians have argued about for two millennia: Is Jesus God?
The ESV translation highlights the difficulty in this passage with a straightforward interpretation: “No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.” Huh? Only God has ever seen God?
All translations agree from the verse’s context that John is talking about Jesus. The KJV, shown above, renders Jesus as the “only begotten Son.” But let’s look at some other translations, which are admittedly evangelical. The NLT reads, “No one has ever seen God. But the unique One, who is himself God, is near to the Father’s heart. He has revealed God to us.” The NIV reads, “No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.” But have these translations taken extra liberty, reading into the text a divine claim for Jesus that doesn’t belong?
The NRSV edition prides itself on its unbiased translation, including interfaith contributors on its translation committee. Shall we get its opinion? “No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.”
How often I’ve heard non-Trinitarians preach that the Bible talks about “God the Father,” but never “God the Son.” Perhaps they’re wrong.
Colossians 1:15, Jesus, the Firstborn
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
//Does this verse mean that Jesus wasn’t born at the start of the first century, but at the beginning of creation? Does it mean that since Jesus was born, he did not exist eternally … but was part of the creation? Does it mean that since Jesus is the firstborn, there are other siblings?
Perhaps it means those things, but in actuality, you can’t read a literal definition into the word “firstborn,” as used in this sense. It simply doesn’t mean what it sounds like it means … not in the Bible.
For example, Ephraim is called the Lord’s firstborn (Jeremiah 31:9) even though Manasseh was born first. David is called the Lord’s “firstborn” (Psalm 89:27) even though he was the youngest of Jesse’s sons.
“Firstborn,” as least as it relates to God’s chosen people, means simply preeminence; the one God has chosen to uplift.
Luke 22:17-19, the Order of the Eucharist
After taking the cup, he gave thanks and said, “Take this and divide it among you … And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it …
//In, Luke, and only in Luke, the cup is served before the bread. Five other places in the New Testament suggest the reverse order. So why is Luke different, and who is right?
Right or wrong, Luke may be actually describing the earlier tradition. Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism, and Luke’s order more closely matches first-century Jewish custom, where a cup of wine is blessed and passed at the beginning of the meal. Moreover, the Didache, perhaps the earliest Christian document not in the Bible, carefully describes the ritual of the Eucharist … and it clearly indicates the cup is shared before the bread.
One reason to imagine the Didache presents the more original order is that it may capture the more primitive meaning in the ritual. It’s nothing like Paul’s rendition. No mention of the Last Supper, no sacrifice, no body or blood. It’s not about the death of Jesus at all, but about his vision of God’s Kingdom. It’s about thanksgiving to God for his provision, and the practice of community sharing. Converts shared a full meal together, not a sip and a wafer.
Connect With Me!